Peer Review Process

The following is the editorial workflow that every manuscript submitted to the journal undergoes during the course of the peer-review process.

The entire editorial workflow is performed using the online review system. Once a manuscript is submitted for publication, the manuscript is checked by the journal’s editorial office to ensure the files are complete and that the relevant metadata are in order. Once this is done, the manuscript is assigned to an Associate Editor on the basis of their subject expertise.

The Associate Editor performs an initial assessment before inviting a number of potential reviewers to provide a peer-review report. (The Associate Editor can reject a manuscript prior to review if not deemed suitable.) On the basis of the submitted reports the Associate Editor makes one of the following recommendations:

· Reject
· Consider after Major Changes
· Consider after Minor Changes
· Publish Unaltered

If the Associate Editor recommends "Reject", the authors are sent the review reports that have been received and are notified that their manuscript will no longer be considered for publication in the journal.

If the Associate Editor recommends "Consider after Major Changes", the authors are notified to prepare and submit an updated version of their manuscript with the necessary changes suggested by the reviewers. This might require new data to be collected or substantial revision of the text. The manuscript is then reassessed by one or more of the original reviewers before the Associate Editor makes a new recommendation.

If the Associate Editor recommends "Consider after Minor Changes", the authors are notified to prepare and submit a final copy of their manuscript with the required minor changes suggested by the reviewers. Once the Editor is satisfied with the final manuscript, optionally having sought further advice from one or more of the reviewers, the Associate Editor can recommend "Publish Unaltered".

If the Associate Editor recommends "Publish Unaltered", the manuscript will undergo a final check by the journal's editorial office in order to ensure that the manuscript and its review process adhere to the journal's guidelines and policies. Once done, the authors will be notified of the manuscript's acceptance.

Editorial Team
Journal of AI and Ethics
ComputingPress
Society for Research in Computing

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.